The topic of your project needs to be a contemporary societal problem, such as , , . The topic must focus on a single aspect, as in How far do corporations intrude into the private lives of their employers? or The social costs of financing the distribution of custom-designed drugs. You may suggest another topic to use, but the instructor must approve the topic during the Week Two Discussion. The Final Research Project will present research relating the responsibilities of a critical thinker to contemporary society. In this assignment, you will do the following: You must take on the perspective of your major field of study and explain in your paper what that perspective is and how it informs your view of the topic. The topics listed above are far too broad to write about in 1012 pages (3,3003,900 words). Instead, you must choose a narrowly defined thesis and approach it from the perspective of your field. If you are an economics major, and you are interested in immigration reform, you should approach a very specific aspect of immigration reform through the lens of economic theory and practice. A specific thesis question would not be, How does illegal immigration influence the U.S. economy? One could write thousands of pages on such a topic. Instead, a better question would be, How do illegal immigrant hotel workers in Chicago impact the economy of Northern Illinois? You would then want to do the research and determine the positive and negative impacts they have, ultimately trying to conclude how illegal immigration in this area should be approached ethically. It is important that you start your research early in this course. Try to find the most important contemporary questions and theories in your field of study and then align the most important questions with a very specific aspect of the general topics above. For example, if you are a psychology major, you might want to start thinking within the realm of healthcare reform or aspects of mental health and criminality in the prison system. You must present a complete argument, including a major claim with at least five points of evidence, information, or data that will prove the claim. After you have defined the problem and created an argument about how one ought to respond to the issue, you need to explain the ethical outcomes of the position you have taken. This should again be in relation to the field of study in which you are working. There might be different ethical outcomes that result from your analysis. For example, going back to the example issue above, from an economic standpoint, illegal immigrants might contribute positively to the economy of Northern Illinois in a specific number of ways. Thus, an economist who believes that positive impact to the economy is the greatest good would say that one should promote the use of illegal immigrants. However, because these workers are often paid less than others and eliminate jobs that could be done by residents of Chicago, there could be other negative ethical outcomes that would outweigh the positive impacts to the economy. It is your goal to draw out the ethical implications of your thesis and explain the underlying rationale that is the foundation for your claim that one action is better than another. The Final Research Project may be presented as a formal research paper (essay format), a PowerPoint presentation, a video, or a podcast equivalent to a minimum of 10 12 pages in APA format (approximately 3,300 3,900 typewritten words, excluding title page and reference pages). Written essays must adhere to all APA formatting standards and requirements, as outlined in the . PowerPoint presentations must include the full text (at least 3,300 words) in the speaker notes portion of the slides, with appropriate citations, and full reference pages. PowerPoint presentations must adhere to the basic principles of and must include citations and references according to APA standards and requirements. Videos and podcasts must include a full transcript, in APA format, including appropriate in-text citations and a references page. There must be no more than 15% quoted content in the body of your essay. All quoted material must bear quotation marks and a full quotation citation. You must have a summary conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the project, presenting the major point of the essay and the evidence supporting that point. The content body of the project must be 3,300 words or more. The word count does not include anything in the title page, running header, or reference list. It is expected that you meet all logistical requirements of this paper. Carefully review the for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment. Distinguished Provides a clear and focused introduction and thesis statement with claim that defines the issue or problem, addresses the importance of the topic, and thoroughly explains its relation to ones field of study. The thesis statement is declarative and proposes an appropriate and feasible solution to the problem or issue. Proficient Provides a clear and focused introduction paragraph and thesis statement with claim that defines the issue or problem, addresses the importance of the topic, and explains its relation to ones field of study. The thesis statement is declarative and proposes a solution to the problem or issue. Minor details are missing or the solution is slightly inappropriate or not feasible. Basic Provides a vague introduction paragraph and a thesis statement with claim that minimally defines the issue or problem, partially addresses the importance of the topic, and partially explains its relation to ones field of study. The thesis statement is somewhat declarative and proposes a solution to the problem or issue. Relevant details are missing and/or the solution is inappropriate and/or not feasible. Below Expectations Attempts to provide an introduction paragraph and a thesis statement with claim; however, the thesis statement is not declarative, the solution to the problem or issue is entirely inappropriate and not feasible, and significant details are missing. Non-Performance The introduction, thesis statement and claim are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions. Distinguished Creates a complete argument, including claims and evidence without obvious logical fallacies that fully addresses ones major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs ones view of the topic. Proficient Creates an argument including claims and evidence without obvious logical fallacies that addresses ones major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs ones view of the topic. The argument is slightly underdeveloped. Basic Creates a partial argument, including some claims and evidence that vaguely addresses ones major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs ones view of the topic. The argument is underdeveloped and/or logical fallacies are present. Below Expectations Attempts to create an argument; however, does not include claims and evidence to address ones major field of study, what the perspective is, and how it informs ones view of the topic. The argument is significantly underdeveloped and many logical fallacies are present. Non-Performance The creation of an argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Distinguished Comprehensively and effectively evaluates the ethical outcomes that result from the position taken on the issue and thoroughly explains how the outcomes influence society and culture. Proficient Evaluates the ethical outcomes that result from the position taken on the issue and explains how the outcomes influence society and culture. The evaluation is slightly underdeveloped. Basic Vaguely evaluates the ethical outcomes that result from the position taken on the issue and partially explains how the outcomes influence society and culture. The evaluation is underdeveloped. Below Expectations Attempts to evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from the position taken on the issue and explain how the outcomes influence society and culture; however, the evaluation is significantly underdeveloped. Non-Performance The evaluation of ethical outcomes is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Distinguished Provides an exceptionally clear, focused, and accurate interpretation of statistical evidence/data from at least two scholarly articles on the selected topic. Proficient Provides a clear and focused interpretation of statistical evidence/data from at least two scholarly articles on the selected topic. The interpretation is slightly underdeveloped or inaccurate. Basic Provides a somewhat clear and focused interpretation of statistical evidence/data from at least two scholarly articles on the selected topic. The interpretation is underdeveloped and/or inaccurate. Below Expectations Attempts to provide an interpretation of statistical evidence/data from at two scholarly articles on the selected topic; however, the interpretation is severely underdeveloped and inaccurate. Non-Performance The interpretation of statistical evidence/data from at least two scholarly articles is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Distinguished Comprehensively evaluates evidence using the following standards: validity, strength, authority, and bias related to the chosen topic. Accurately identifies strengths and weaknesses. Proficient Evaluates evidence using the following standards: validity, strength, authority, and bias related to the chosen topic. Accurately identifies most of the strengths and weaknesses. The evaluation is slightly underdeveloped. Basic Partially evaluates evidence using some of the following standards: validity, strength, authority, and bias related to the chosen topic. Identifies some of the strengths and weaknesses. The evaluation is underdeveloped and/or inaccurate. Below Expectations Attempts to evaluate evidence using the following standards: validity, strength, authority, and bias related to the chosen topic; however, identifies few of the strengths and weaknesses, and the evaluation is significantly underdeveloped and inaccurate. Non-Performance The evaluation of evidence using critical thinking skills is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Distinguished Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand. Proficient Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand. Basic Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader. Non-Performance The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Distinguished Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page. Proficient Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA. Non-Performance The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Distinguished The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words. Proficient The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words. Basic The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words. Below Expectations The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words. Non-Performance The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Distinguished Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Proficient Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Basic Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly. Below Expectations Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly. Non-Performance The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Purchase the answer to view it
